"One can never consent to creep when one feels an impulse to soar." - Helen Keller
Showing posts with label disability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disability. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
A New World
Marla called me early yesterday morning. Marla is a nurse in the NICU at one of our local hospitals, and she and I met while our sons played little league T-ball many years ago. She also stopped by to visit when Ashley was in ICU about 10 years ago. Actually, I hadn’t heard from her since that time.
Seems a new mom was having a tough time. She had delivered twins last weekend – one of them didn’t survive the birth, and the other was significantly disabled. The doctors feared that the baby was deaf and blind. They knew she had trouble breathing and very frequent seizures. Her survival wasn’t ensured, and after witnessing the mother’s breakdowns every time someone mentioned her child, Marla asked me to stop by to see if the mother would like to talk to me.
I agreed but I was scared to death.
The only qualification I have for helping someone like that is the fact that I have been through some tough times myself. But, I didn’t give birth to Ashley, and I feared that added another dimension I was definitely unqualified to address. But I couldn’t refuse.
I will meet this new mom tomorrow, and between now and then I need to think about what I will say and do. Hopefully some of you can help me with that.
I can say I understand her fears but my understanding only came after the fact with Ashley. I wasn’t there at Ashley’s birth. I didn’t wonder if my baby would survive those first weeks, and I never had the dark secret thought that it might be best if she didn’t.
I didn’t question what my life would be like when my baby was sent home with me. I didn’t wonder if I would be capable of caring for her, keeping her alive, and loving her. Most of the hard times came long before I brought Ashley home at age 2. How can I sit next to this new mother, hold her hand, and tell her I understand?
This mother had no choices really. I did. I chose to bring Ashley into my life. I chose knowing that my life and my son’s life would be turned upside down. I accepted the fact that I was entering an entirely new way of living and parenting, and even more than acceptance, I wanted it. This mother wanted two babies, babies considered ‘normal’, babies that would need care and love but not tube feedings and seizure meds.
What do I say? Or, do I say nothing and just let her know that I am there if and when she wants to talk? Do I tell her the baby is ‘special’ and that she, the mother, will find the strength to love and care for her daughter? How can I really say that when I don’t know if it is true?
Do I ask how her husband feels, if indeed she has a husband? Again, this will be a point around which we will not truly relate. I made the decision to adopt Ashley as a single parent. I know many marriages don’t survive the birth of a child with severe disabilities. Do I say that? Do I suggest she see a counselor as soon as possible?
I sincerely hope this is a parent, or parents, who can find the strength to love and care for their baby. But if they can’t, I hope they also have the strength to let someone else do it for them….and I don’t mean an institution.
I want to help, but first I need your help.
Friday, August 26, 2011
Bring Them Together

A week ago, I wrote about a father who beheaded his son with disabilities. The father said the constant and ongoing care made him look at his son as an object rather than a person. Today in the news is the story of a mother who dropped her baby from a parking garage. The baby had an orthopedic condition that was correctible, but the mother was overwhelmed by the way the child looked. And, my blog is full of other similar stories.
In each of the cases, the offending parent is usually prosecuted and convicted. But I really wonder – does it have to get to that point? What if the parents had support early on, support that would help them learn coping techniques, support from someone who has ‘been there, done that.’
Obviously something is not working in our society when it comes to caring for a child with disabilities.
Many, many parents, probably even most parents, when confronted with raising a child with disabilities, will buckle down, educate themselves, and become even better parents than initially thought possible. The provide love and encouragement, care and consistency. They provide a future for their child.
And then there are the parents who do not.
I wonder if bringing the two together could make a difference. Would having a parent in a similar situation, a parent who has developed coping techniques, who has learned to bury the dark thoughts, who has become an advocate for their child, a parent who could serve as a role model for the new and/or overwhelmed parent begin to save lives?
I was lucky. I found a group of supportive parents who could be there for me. Parents who could help me navigate the systems which so often lack the understanding and compassion we and our children need. But in the beginning I did feel an intense isolation. I believed no one understood what my life was like, and I believed that everyone was judging me. It took action on my part to find my circle of parents, and I wonder if the overwhelmed parents are even capable of taking that action.
I don’t know who could connect the two. I don’t know who could set up a mentorship program that provided support when it was instantly and desperately needed. But I think it is an idea that should be tried.
I’m tired of reading about children who die – children who could have long happy lives.
Monday, June 13, 2011
A World of Disability

"15% of the world's population is disabled."
"Some 785 million people have a significant physical or mental disability, including about 5 percent of children."
"Problems are worsened by poverty and dozens of other variables, including stigma, architectural barriers, lack of legal protection, the cost of devices and assistance, and the lack of knowledge by others (especially health professionals) about how to interact with disabled people."
Check out this June 9th article from the Washinton Post for more info....
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
We Proclaim...
Please take a moment to read the piece below, and then visit the ADAPT blog, Defending Our Freedom. Also, at the end of this piece is a short video about ADAPT.
A DISABLED MANIFESTO
By John R. Woodward, M.S.W. Center for Independent Living of North Florida, Inc
We proclaim that we are born free and equal human beings; that our disabilities are limitations only, and that our identity does not derive from being disabled.
We proclaim that we have the same value as people who are not disabled, and we reject any scheme of labeling or classifying us that encourages people to think of us as having diminished value.
We reject the idea that institutions must be created to"care" for us, and proclaim that these institutions have been used to "manage" us in ways that non-disabled people are not expected to accept. We particularly denounce institutions whose purpose is to punish us for being disabled, or to confine us for the convenience of others.
We reject the notion that we need "experts," to tell ushow to live, especially experts from the able-bodied world. We are not diagnoses in need of a cure or cases to be closed. We are human, with human dreams and ambitions.
We deny that images of disability are appropriatemetaphors for incompetence, stupidity, ugliness or weakness.
We are aware that as people with disabilities, we have been considered objects of charity and we have been considered commodities. We are neither. We reject charitable enterprises that exploit our lifestyle to titillate others, and which propose to establish the rules by which we must live without our participation. We also reject businesses that use us as "warm bodies" to provide a passive market for their services, again laying down rules by which we must live for their profit. We recognize that the lines between charities and businesses are blurred in the disability industry, and we do not accept services from either if their essential function is to exploit us.
We assert our rights of self-determination in the face ofrules, eligibility criteria, regulations, customs, laws or other barriers, and we pledge not to allow any authority or institution to deprive us of our freedom of choice.
Finally, we assert that any service we need, from specialized teaching to personal care, can be provided to us in the community among our non-disabled peers. Segregated institutions are not necessary to serve us, and they have been the greatest source of our oppression, especially when they have been run by able-bodied people without our participation.
All human beings are more alike than we are different. We recognize that when we assert this belief we will find ourselves in conflict with regressive institutions and their supporters, some of whom may be disabled themselves. We do not expect thousands of years of stereotyping to dissipate quickly. We commit ourselves and those who come after us to challenge our oppression on every level until we are allowed to be fully human and assert our individuality ahead of our disability.
-------------------------
Who is ADAPT?
A DISABLED MANIFESTO
By John R. Woodward, M.S.W. Center for Independent Living of North Florida, Inc
We proclaim that we are born free and equal human beings; that our disabilities are limitations only, and that our identity does not derive from being disabled.
We proclaim that we have the same value as people who are not disabled, and we reject any scheme of labeling or classifying us that encourages people to think of us as having diminished value.
We reject the idea that institutions must be created to"care" for us, and proclaim that these institutions have been used to "manage" us in ways that non-disabled people are not expected to accept. We particularly denounce institutions whose purpose is to punish us for being disabled, or to confine us for the convenience of others.
We reject the notion that we need "experts," to tell ushow to live, especially experts from the able-bodied world. We are not diagnoses in need of a cure or cases to be closed. We are human, with human dreams and ambitions.
We deny that images of disability are appropriatemetaphors for incompetence, stupidity, ugliness or weakness.
We are aware that as people with disabilities, we have been considered objects of charity and we have been considered commodities. We are neither. We reject charitable enterprises that exploit our lifestyle to titillate others, and which propose to establish the rules by which we must live without our participation. We also reject businesses that use us as "warm bodies" to provide a passive market for their services, again laying down rules by which we must live for their profit. We recognize that the lines between charities and businesses are blurred in the disability industry, and we do not accept services from either if their essential function is to exploit us.
We assert our rights of self-determination in the face ofrules, eligibility criteria, regulations, customs, laws or other barriers, and we pledge not to allow any authority or institution to deprive us of our freedom of choice.
Finally, we assert that any service we need, from specialized teaching to personal care, can be provided to us in the community among our non-disabled peers. Segregated institutions are not necessary to serve us, and they have been the greatest source of our oppression, especially when they have been run by able-bodied people without our participation.
All human beings are more alike than we are different. We recognize that when we assert this belief we will find ourselves in conflict with regressive institutions and their supporters, some of whom may be disabled themselves. We do not expect thousands of years of stereotyping to dissipate quickly. We commit ourselves and those who come after us to challenge our oppression on every level until we are allowed to be fully human and assert our individuality ahead of our disability.
-------------------------
Who is ADAPT?
Labels:
advocacy,
civil rights,
disability,
in the public eye,
inclusion
Monday, August 23, 2010
Really, Jennifer

Dear Ms. Aniston,
I really liked the character you played on Friends. And, although I haven't seen many of your movies, you know, the ones where you play pretty much the same Rachel character, I did feel bad for you when things didn't work out with Brad and John and Vince.
Your newest movie looks interesting, especially the concept of women having babies even without being married or in a relationship. In fact, I wouldn't be at all surprised to hear that you have decided to find a sperm donor and become a parent yourself.
However, if you do become a parent, I really, really hope for the sake of your child, that he/she is born without disabilities because I really don't think after your comment on the Regis and Kelly Show that you would be a good parent to such a child.
Just saying,
Ashley's Mom
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
265
Ashley has been on our state's debelopmental disabilities Medicaid waiver waiting list for 7 years. Each year, she receives a letter letting her know where she is on the list. This year, she is number 265. Seven years ago, she was in position 345.
I'll let this video explain our frustration and the frustration of hundreds of thousands of other families and individuals with disabilities.
I'll let this video explain our frustration and the frustration of hundreds of thousands of other families and individuals with disabilities.
Labels:
community living,
despair,
disability,
spread the word
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Why?

The group home in which Jessica lives is dark. The draperies are usually closed – the furnishings are dark and heavy – even the air inside the home seems oppressive.
The day support program she attends is in a one-story cinderblock building. The walls are institutional green – the adornments on the walls are posters about CPR and behavior management – the furniture is old and mismatched and lost its original color years ago.
The school classroom to which Jessica is assigned is in the basement of the school building. It too is dark and joyless. Again, the walls are institutional colors, and many of the lights are burned out. There are no windows and whole feeling is one of gloominess.
The descriptions above are not the exception. Jessica used to attend a different day support program, and it was worse than her current program. And the other two group homes in which she has lived were also dark, gloomy, and drab.
Why?
Why don’t people with disabilities deserve lightness, bright rooms, cheery kitchens and the occasional barbecue outside? Why can’t they assist in planting flowers and a vegetable garden at their group homes? Why can’t the draperies be opened more frequently and why can’t pleasant music be playing in the background rather than the constant din of the television?
How can we expect children with disabilities to be excited about going to school when the being there provides nothing visually stimulating? Do school districts think our students with disabilities will learn more if there is nothing but plain green walls to distract them? Why aren't there 'spirit' posters and announcements of school dances in the 'special education' hall? In fact, why is there even a 'special education' hall?
How can we expect our children with disabilities to learn and grow at their day support programs when they dread going there? Why can’t there be celebrations and joy in the places they spend the majority of their day - maybe ice cream sundaes and cupcakes with rainbow sprinkles? Why can't the staff smile more - do they really hate their jobs as much as their faces seem to say? Why must their lives be filled with darkness and gloom? Again, a little paint would go a long way to improving everyone’s moods.
I wish I had the time and money to paint, refurnish, and refurbish these places. I’m convinced that we would see improved moods and improved behaviors if environments were improved first.
Monday, May 24, 2010
Forced To Leave Home, Part 2

Cheryl from the blog Finding My Way: Journey of an Uppity Intellectual Activist Crip, left the following comment on last Friday's blog post. I thought it important enough to repost here:
_____________________________________________
ADAPT had Syracuse/Cornell do a study that found that funds for the Community Choice Act would cost middle class Americans $6.07 in taxes a YEAR to keep people in the community. That's without factoring in the savings from all the institutions that would be forced to close as a result. Then we paid for a Harris Poll where 2/3 of Americans said they would support the bill before they even knew how much it cost. After they found out it, that number went up to 89%. Now what bill has an 89% approval rating? All you have to do is skip 1 trip to Starbucks a year. Here's a link to the fact sheet:
Cost and Benefits of the Community Choice Act
So, what I want to know is where do I send my $6.07
________________________________________________
Watching states balance their budgets by cutting services to people with disabilities is not the only way they are forcing more institutional decisions.
I spoke with a mother of a 15 year old young man who is severely disabled but who wants to stay home with his family. To accomplish that, the family must have the assistance of nurses around the clock. Unfortunately, they live in a smaller city in Virginia, a city not known for available service providers.
This young man is approved for nursing services and for enough hours to provide the assistance the family needs to keep their son home with them. But they can’t find nurses to staff the positions that have been approved. This is yet another example of how people with disabilities are being forced into making a decision to institutionalize.
I believe that our state Medicaid services should be required to maintain an adequate number of providers for the people with disabilities in the state. Whether that means raising salaries and reimbursements rates, or providing additional training, whatever is required to make sure that people have the support they need to stay in the community.
But there’s the rub – I don’t believe our states, or at least my state, wants people to remain in the community. Why else would our budget this year provide funds to build a new institution and not fund more community based waiver slots?
Labels:
community living,
despair,
disability,
government
Friday, May 21, 2010
Forced To Leave Home

Born with cerebral palsy, Ms. Hickey, now 67 years old, is confined to a motorized wheelchair. She lives alone and relies on certified nurse's assistants to get her in and out of bed, bathed, clothed and fed.
In December, she received a letter from the South Carolina Department of Special Needs and Disabilities, saying her weekly 50 hours of personal-care help was being cut to 28 hours. That meant Ms. Hickey would get help for two hours in the morning and two hours at night. If she needed to use the bathroom in between, she would sit in a soiled diaper.
Not a day goes by that I don't hear or read about how states are trying to balance their depleted budgets by cutting services to people with disabilities. Lulled into a false sense of budgetary security by the influx of stimulus money, the time to pay the piper is now upon state governments.
People with disabilities are being forced into institutions because home-based services are the first things cut. Where is the Olmstead Decision in all this? Don't our state leaders read the literature that has proven it costs more to keep a person in an institution rather than in their home and their community?
This article from the Wall Street Journal is just one of many more to come, I fear.
Labels:
community living,
despair,
disability,
government
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Kick In The Gut or Just Another Character

You've all probably heard and read about the controversy over last week's Family Guy episode. But if you haven't, I wanted to share these selected writings from Patricia E. Bauer's blog. She has done an excellent job gathering opinions from both sides of the controversy. Take a few minutes to read through them, and then let me know your thoughts.
**************************
Palin describes the show as a ‘kick in the gut’
From the New York Daily News:
Following a Valentine’s Day broadcast of Fox’s Family Guy that got laughs at the expense of a character with Down syndrome, former Alaska governor and Fox commentator Sarah Palin published a Facebook post saying the show had “mocked” her son Trig, who has Down syndrome.
Palin said the show, in which the character was labeled a “little whore” and a “poorly groomin’ Down syndrome girl,” felt like a”kick in the gut.” Her Facebook comment included a paragraph attributed to her daughter Bristol that begged for compassion toward people with disabilities and ended by calling the show’s writers “heartless jerks.” The text follows:
“When you’re the son or daughter of a public figure, you have to develop thick skin. My siblings and I all have that, but insults directed at our youngest brother hurt too much for us to remain silent. People with special needs face challenges that many of us will never confront, and yet they are some of the kindest and most loving people you’ll ever meet. Their lives are difficult enough as it is, so why would anyone want to make their lives more difficult by mocking them? As a culture, shouldn’t we be more compassionate to innocent people – especially those who are less fortunate? Shouldn’t we be willing to say that some things just are not funny? Are there any limits to what some people will do or say in regards to my little brother or others in the special needs community? If the writers of a particularly pathetic cartoon show thought they were being clever in mocking my brother and my family yesterday, they failed. All they proved is that they’re heartless jerks. — Bristol Palin”
(Ellen, the character with Down syndrome, was voiced by Andrea Fay Friedman, an actress who has Down syndrome.)
**************************
Ellen Seidman, writing at Huffingtonpost.com, says Sarah Palin’s criticism a recent episode of ‘Family Guy’ is “completely misguided.” Seidman, whose son has cerebral palsy, says she applauds what she views as the show’s message — that people with disabilities are people just like everyone else. An excerpt:
I work so hard to spread that message every single day of my son’s life. It is an endless, Sisyphean labor of love. To be sure, I would not enjoy it if someone called Max an asshole, but hey, at least they’d be engaging with him instead of just gaping. At least they’d be treating him like a typical person instead of like a freak show.
Sarah, the genius of this episode is that it made a girl with Down syndrome seem like just another feisty teenager with ‘tude. It also gave people in this country a way to get the conversation going about people with disabilities.
… Really, you should be grateful to “The Family Guy” — for tackling a taboo topic with relatable humor and smarts; for holding a funhouse mirror up to the public so they can recognize their shortcomings in their dealings with people who are handicapped; and for being real.
**************************
Assessing Sarah Palin’s criticism of ‘Family Guy,’ Jennifer Armstrong on Entertainment Weekly’s Popwatch blog says the show actually treated Ellen, the character with Down syndrome, “very much like any other character, which shows quite a bit of respect in the Family Guy universe.” An excerpt of her comments (accompanied by a video of the show’s “Down Syndrome Girl” number):
Her defining trait wasn’t her Down syndrome, it was the fact that she was bitchy and demanding and ultimately rejected Chris even though he heeded her every command. You could see it as mocking, I suppose, that Stewie sang a song called “Down Syndrome Girl” while getting Chris ready for his date. But that made a lot more fun of poor Chris and his smelly, gross tendencies than it did of his date.
Yes, there are references to hugs that are “tighter than a vice and go on for an hour,” the “shorty bus,” and the fact that she’s “for some reason always shouting.”(Side note: Ellen herself didn’t shout.) But is this enough to warrant Palin’s wrath? I honestly don’t know — I don’t have a child with Down syndrome. I do, however, salute including those with the condition in our everyday entertainment, and doing so without patronizing them. This episode did that, and even came off pretty sweet, by Family Guy standards.
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
They Came, They Talked - Did Anyone Listen?

Hundreds of people showed up, some as early as 4am on a morning where the temperature was only 13 degrees. At 8am, they started getting the numbers that would indicate the order in which they could share their stories. By noon, the start time of the hearing, even the term standing room only couldn’t describe the crowd.
Monday, January 11th, was the day that the Virginia General Assembly said they would listen to the concerns of those opposed to balancing the state’s budget by cutting services to people with disabilities. The hearing started promptly at noon, and based on the number of people scheduled to give three minute testimonies, the hearing was going to last well into the night. I got number 168, and just by doing the math, that meant around 8pm.
There were parents – and caregivers – and service providers – and doctors – and teachers – and preachers. Brothers, sisters, parents, and friends. There were people with disabilities – people in wheelchairs, people with braces supporting their bodies, people with white canes, and people who could only get three sentences out in their allotted three minute speaking time. All shared the same message – please do not make the lives of people whose lives are already difficult any worse.
They begged to keep respite hours. They cried as they talked of their family members who were aggressive. They voices became a whisper of worry when talking about what would happen to their most fragile of loves. They were defiant and proud and it was obvious that they were also uncomfortable having to beg to keep their lives afloat.
Did it make a difference? We won’t know for a couple of months, but given the dire straits of the budget situation, I don’t have much hope. I do hope that the assembly members listened and really heard the stories today. If a difference can’t be made immediately, maybe it can be made in the future.
And to a person, the most important statement everyone shared was – we do not need another institution….please divert those funds to the community supports that will keep people with disabilities with their friends and their families.
Please keep Virginia, its people with disabilities, their friends and families, and the General Assembly members who hold fate in their hands in your prayers.
Labels:
disability,
fears,
government,
making a difference
Friday, December 18, 2009
A Single File Existence

I guess I never paid attention to this before.
Back in 2006, I wrote about some adult group home residents that I saw at one of our local malls. I wrote about their walk through the mall – “I saw the two women in charge leading the slow-moving group, and the four clients trudging slowly behind, not seeming the least bit interested in their surroundings. They were in almost a single file line, and at the end of the line was Jack, working desperately to pull his underwear from his behind where it had apparently gotten ‘stuck’.”
Then yesterday, while shopping at Walmart, I saw an older gentleman with Down Syndrome, probably in his 40’s, shopping with someone who appeared to be his mother. I’ve seen the two of them before out and about in some of the same neighborhood places I frequent. This gentleman followed his mother in single file through the store, and has done the same thing every time I see him.
Also yesterday, I drove past an apartment complex near my home, apartments where our local community service board assists adults with intellectual disabilities live as independently as possible. I often see some of the residents making their way to the Walgreens or the McDonalds on the corner. Every time I see them, no matter how large their group, they are walking in single file.
Why single file? Why not walking side by side, chatting, laughing or even arguing? Instead, their faces are frozen with no expressions – they never talk to each other – they just walk, one behind the other, to their destination and then back home again.
How did they learn this behavior? Is this what we have taught them is the only acceptable way to be a part of their community?
All this saddened me, and I plan to make sure my children know they don’t have to walk in single file. They can run and skip, they can link arms or hold hands, they can talk and laugh and yell sometimes. I don’t want my children, or for that matter, any other person with a disability, to have a single file life.
Today I am thankful for bold, quirky people. They make life so much more interesting.
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Do NOT Pity Me

Following our normal post-Thanksgiving tradition, the kids and I headed out pretty early last Friday for some Black Friday shopping. I love finding deals, but I also love the experience of moving along with a crazed crowd searching for an item that you know will cost less after the first of the year.
I wrote last year about our Black Friday experience and the problems we had navigating some stores with a wheelchair. It was interesting to me that this year things were a little easier. I wonder if all those store managers read my blog?
Since the navigating part of our Black Friday experience was easier this year, I was able to spend sometime people-watching. I saw lots of different ‘looks’ on the shopper’s faces – worry, excitement, the thrill of the hunt – but I also saw something that bothered me. I saw pity and sadness whenever a shopper would look at me pushing Ashley through the store.
Over the years, I have learned to deal with people feeling sorry for Ashley. I usually scoff a bit and enlighten them on some of Ashley’s antics. I share how she is much more like her peers than different, and it usually works. People would walk away with a good bit of the pity look wiped off their face. But this time the pity seemed directed at me.
It hit me pretty hard. Do people feel sorry for me that I have a daughter in a wheelchair? Do they believe my life is less than good because of that? Do they think I have regrets and dream about the child Ashley could have been had her birthmother not been an alcoholic?
I wish all those people with their pitying looks could read this blog. I wish they could understand that my life is complete, not unfulfilled, because I have a child with a significant disability. I wish they could spend a day with us and see that we are a joyful and more typical family than they think. I wish I could tell them that I am happier then I ever dreamed possible BECAUSE I have a child with a disability.
Here’s hoping some of them will read this blog, and will then understand.
Today I am thankful that Ashley's birthmother agreed to place her for adoption
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Hope For The Future

The belief in the inner beauty of each and every human being is at the heart of L’Arche…and at the heart of being human… We do not discover who we are, we do not reach true humanness, in a solitary state; we discover it through mutual dependency, in weakness, in learning through belonging.
-Jean Vanier, Becoming Human
I believe my biggest fear in life is what is going to happen after my death – happen to Ashley.
Ashley has made great strides in her short life. Doctors said she wouldn’t live – then said she wouldn’t walk – then said she would never communicate. From infancy, they recommended institutionalization. As my regular readers know, those doctors were very, very wrong. But, Ashley will need support throughout her life.
Just as Helen Keller needed assistance, so will Ashley. So, my challenge is figuring out how to ensure that assistance even after I am no longer able to provide it myself.
My experience with run-of-the-mill group homes is not good. Even under the best of situations, I don’t know of any group homes that are equipped or knowledgeable enough to support a person with deafblindness. My oldest son has tossed around the idea of establishing a group home, a group home done right, when he graduates from college. But that idea is mingled with a lot of other dreams he has, so I can’t count on that happening. And, I often feel that it is selfish of me to expect him to continue to care for his sister after I am gone. I know without a doubt that no one could care for her better, and I do pray that even if he chooses not to be her lifelong caregiver that he will at least stay very close to her.
I was offered a glimmer of hope last week when I read an article about L’Arche, a group that enables people with and without disabilities to share their lives in communities of faith and friendship. I’ve visited their website and like what I see there. I plan to explore this option a lot more, but I’m interested if any of you know of or have heard anything about L’Arche.
I know Ashley is just 14 years old, but the time to start planning for the future is now, not later, in my humble opinion.
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Will A Grassroots Movement Work?
The Virginia Alliance for Community today called on all candidates for statewide office and House of Delegates to adopt a “Community for All” platform that reforms Virginia’s system of supports for persons with intellectual and other developmental disabilities. The Alliance -- formed in 2008 by the Virginia Board for People with Disabilities, the Partnership for People with Disabilities, the Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy, and The Arc of Virginia -- provides a unified voice in advocating for the civil rights and needed services for Virginians with intellectual and other developmental disabilities.

What’s the Problem?
--- Virginia continues to inappropriately segregate persons with intellectual and other disabilities in expensive state institutions (Training Centers).
--- Training Center costs continue to rise and have now reached an average of $194,000 a person a year at the state institutions.
--- Community care through the ID/MR waiver for persons living in congregate settings, primarily waiver group homes, costs $95,000 per person annually -- half the cost of institutional care for individuals with equivalent levels of need.
--- Virginia is one of only 10 states that have not closed any state operated institutions for persons with intellectual and other developmental disabilities. Eleven states have already closed all of their state-operated institutions.
--- Training Centers are old and in growing need of major repairs -- the “youngest” buildings at NVTC and SWVTC are already over 30 years old. Residential buildings at CVTC, SEVTC and SVTC are much older.
--- The potential costs to rebuild or renovate all five state Training Centers would well exceed $100 million dollars, which is unjustifiable, particularly in a period of limited state revenues.
--- Spending scarce state dollars to rebuild and operate state institutions means fewer dollars available in the future to address the state’s growing waiting lists for the ID and DD waivers -- well over 5,000 persons are already waiting.
--- There are now 17,000 individuals with ID or DD living at home with parents 60 years or older. These individuals will want and will need community supports as their caregivers die or can no longer provided needed care
--- Continued maintenance of large state Training Centers runs counter to the service design both desired by individuals with ID/DD and being pursued by the Commonwealth. Through its System Transformation Grant and Money Follows the Person initiative, Virginia is making great strides to develop an ID/DD service system that is person-centered and promotes community integration.
It is NOT reasonable to segregate people in institutions when experience and research prove that even people with significant disabilities and intensive needs can be supported in the community.
It is NOT reasonable to continue to invest scarce public dollars operating large, inefficient state institutions when there is a better way.
It is NOT reasonable to deny persons with disabilities the right to live among us in the community if needed supports are provided.
What’s the Solution?
--- Commit to transition Virginia’s segregated, institutional system by adopting “Community for All” policy.
--- Halt future plans to rebuild state Training Centers. Virginians with the most significant disabilities can -- and do -- live in their own community homes when appropriate supports are available to them. Capital outlays can be leveraged with community housing money to significantly expand available, limited state dollars.
--- Consider the fiscal reality. Is it the best use of limited resources to spend $194,000 to support an individual in a state operated institution when individuals with like needs are being supported in the community for half that cost?
--- Make a true long-term commitment to eliminating waiting lists for waivers and other supports by developing and adopting a reform plan that transitions Virginia from its inefficient institutions to innovative, person-centered supports in the community.
Now is the time for disability reform in Virginia. It is no longer morally or fiscally responsible to invest in segregated settings for our citizens with disabilities. As friends, neighbors, self-advocates, and taxpayers, we ask all state level candidates -- gubernatorial and legislative -- to end this segregation and make community living for all Virginians with disabilities a priority in their campaigns as well as in their legislative initiatives.
Today I am thankful that I have the resources to provide a home for my children, a real home - not an institution.

What’s the Problem?
--- Virginia continues to inappropriately segregate persons with intellectual and other disabilities in expensive state institutions (Training Centers).
--- Training Center costs continue to rise and have now reached an average of $194,000 a person a year at the state institutions.
--- Community care through the ID/MR waiver for persons living in congregate settings, primarily waiver group homes, costs $95,000 per person annually -- half the cost of institutional care for individuals with equivalent levels of need.
--- Virginia is one of only 10 states that have not closed any state operated institutions for persons with intellectual and other developmental disabilities. Eleven states have already closed all of their state-operated institutions.
--- Training Centers are old and in growing need of major repairs -- the “youngest” buildings at NVTC and SWVTC are already over 30 years old. Residential buildings at CVTC, SEVTC and SVTC are much older.
--- The potential costs to rebuild or renovate all five state Training Centers would well exceed $100 million dollars, which is unjustifiable, particularly in a period of limited state revenues.
--- Spending scarce state dollars to rebuild and operate state institutions means fewer dollars available in the future to address the state’s growing waiting lists for the ID and DD waivers -- well over 5,000 persons are already waiting.
--- There are now 17,000 individuals with ID or DD living at home with parents 60 years or older. These individuals will want and will need community supports as their caregivers die or can no longer provided needed care
--- Continued maintenance of large state Training Centers runs counter to the service design both desired by individuals with ID/DD and being pursued by the Commonwealth. Through its System Transformation Grant and Money Follows the Person initiative, Virginia is making great strides to develop an ID/DD service system that is person-centered and promotes community integration.
It is NOT reasonable to segregate people in institutions when experience and research prove that even people with significant disabilities and intensive needs can be supported in the community.
It is NOT reasonable to continue to invest scarce public dollars operating large, inefficient state institutions when there is a better way.
It is NOT reasonable to deny persons with disabilities the right to live among us in the community if needed supports are provided.
What’s the Solution?
--- Commit to transition Virginia’s segregated, institutional system by adopting “Community for All” policy.
--- Halt future plans to rebuild state Training Centers. Virginians with the most significant disabilities can -- and do -- live in their own community homes when appropriate supports are available to them. Capital outlays can be leveraged with community housing money to significantly expand available, limited state dollars.
--- Consider the fiscal reality. Is it the best use of limited resources to spend $194,000 to support an individual in a state operated institution when individuals with like needs are being supported in the community for half that cost?
--- Make a true long-term commitment to eliminating waiting lists for waivers and other supports by developing and adopting a reform plan that transitions Virginia from its inefficient institutions to innovative, person-centered supports in the community.
Now is the time for disability reform in Virginia. It is no longer morally or fiscally responsible to invest in segregated settings for our citizens with disabilities. As friends, neighbors, self-advocates, and taxpayers, we ask all state level candidates -- gubernatorial and legislative -- to end this segregation and make community living for all Virginians with disabilities a priority in their campaigns as well as in their legislative initiatives.
Today I am thankful that I have the resources to provide a home for my children, a real home - not an institution.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Chill, Baby

If I hear one more time that the primary purpose of high school education for children with disabilities is to prepare them for work, I am going to scream. I wrote last week about Ashley not getting History or Science in high school because ‘she doesn’t have a history or science disability.” Her IEP draft was full of ‘vocational’ goals and objectives, and if the school district staff asked me yet again if I had ‘connected’ with vocational rehab agencies for Ashley, I might just have told them where they could stick their sheltered workshop job.
I understand that our children with disabilities may need a little more time to prepare for the workforce, but seven freakin’ years??? That seems a tad excessive to me. Heck, I can start listing the names of many non-disabled high school students who were not prepared for adulthood and the workforce when they left high school. And, are our children to have no other focus in their lives once they turn 14 years old? That’s pretty sad if that is what the school district believes.
Why shouldn’t our children with disabilities be entitled to the same work-life balance being promoted for those without disabilities? (Work-life balance can also be applied, imho, to education-life balance).
According to a survey conducted by the National Life Insurance Co., four out of ten employees state that their jobs are "very" or "extremely" stressful. Those in high stress jobs are three times more likely than others to suffer from stress-related medical conditions and are twice as likely to quit. The study states that women, in particular, report stress related to the conflict between work and family. Do you think our children with disabilities can also suffer from stress? Heck, their lives are often nothing but stress.
The number of stress-related disability claims by American employees has doubled according to the Employee Assistance Professionals Association in Arlington, Virginia. Seventy-five to ninety percent of physician visits are related to stress and, according to the American Institute of Stress, the cost to industry has been estimated at $200 billion-$300 billion a year. What do you think the costs will be if a person with a significant disability experiences stress and burnout?
Ashley loves art – and music – and plants – and shopping – and traveling – and reading – and math – and science. Restricting her enjoyment of those things during her remaining school career – approximately seven years – will not a happy future employee make. And don’t even get me started on the preconceived notions about the type of work our children with significant disabilities will be targeted to perform. Trust me, if you ask Ashley to stuff envelopes for eight hours a day, five days a week, envelopes won’t be the only things getting stuffed.
School districts need to lighten up. Let our children with disabilities enjoy their high school years as much as non-disabled students. Don’t start them down a path to stress and then wonder why it costs so much to provide care for them later in life.
Chill, baby….
Labels:
disability,
dreams,
education,
independent living
Monday, August 3, 2009
Diner Part Deux

Last October, I wrote about an unexpected and wonderful experience my children and I had while having lunch at one of our favorite restaurants. Well, it seems this particular restaurant is chock full of ‘experiences’ for us because something else happened this past Saturday.
We decided to have lunch at the River City Diner again. It was quite crowded but the server was agreeable to seating us in a quiet location away from the hustle and bustle of the lunch crowd. Ashley, understandably, does much better with meals when we keep the stimulation and distractions to a minimum, especially on this particular Saturday because she wasn’t feeling her best.
As the server approached our table to take our orders, Ashley hit the side of her head with her hand. It’s something she does when she is distressed, and although it doesn’t happen often, when it does happen it can be quite disconcerting. The server stopped in her tracks, a few yards from our table, and had a look of shock and horror on her face. She recovered quickly though, and came to the table to take our drink orders.
When the server returned with our drinks and to take our food orders, she immediately apologized for her earlier actions. She said that she had a nephew with Autism, and that she should have behaved better. She convinced me that she understood such behaviors, and she seemed genuinely contrite. I told her I appreciated her apology, and then just gave her our orders.
She was quite an attentive server, a young mother she told us, and a very typical diner sort of waitress. While the reaction initially annoyed me, the result, I believe, was positive. And, I’m hoping that some of the other customers seated nearby also were aware of the exchange, and perhaps had their minds opened a bit also.
What do you think? What would your reaction have been, and would you have handled things differently? I’m really interested in your comments, because as parents of children with special needs know, this sort of situation is common.
Labels:
confusing,
disability,
fears,
in the public eye
Friday, July 24, 2009
Happy Anniversary!

Today, Mr. Obama will sign a proclamation celebrating the 19th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the exact date is July 26th for the anniversary).
So while you are eating your anniversary cake, read the statistics below from the U.S. Census Bureau. What? You have no cake? Well, there is a great recipe at the end of this post that will make a relatively healthy, very easy, and very yummy cake. It’s perfect for enlisting the aid of your children, regardless of their level of ability.
41.2 million - Number of people who have some level of disability. They represent 15 percent of the civilian noninstitutionalized population 5 and older.
6 percent of children 5 to 15 have disabilities.
12 percent of people 16 to 64 have disabilities.
41 percent of adults 65 and older have disabilities.
15% - Percentage of females with a disability, compared with 14 percent of males.
11 million - Number of disabled people 6 and older who need personal assistance with everyday activities. This group amounts to 4 percent of people in this age category. These activities include such tasks as getting around inside the home, taking a bath or shower, preparing meals and performing light housework.
3.3 million - Number of people 15 and older who use a wheelchair. Another 10.2 million use an ambulatory aid such as a cane, crutches or walker.
1.8 million - Number of people 15 and older who report being unable to see printed words at all or were blind.
1 million - Number of people 15 and older who reported deafness or being unable to hear conversations at all.
2.5 million - Number of people 15 and older who have some difficulty having their speech understood by others. Of this number, 431,000 were unable to have their speech understood at all.
16.1 million - Number of people with limitations in cognitive functioning, or who have a mental or emotional illness that interferes with daily activities. This group comprises 7 percent of the population 15 and older. This included 8.4 million with one or more problems that interfere with daily activities, such as frequently being depressed or anxious, trouble getting along with others, trouble concentrating and trouble coping with stress.
13.3 million - Number of 16- to 64-year-olds who reported a medical condition that makes it difficult to find a job or remain employed. They comprise 7 percent of the population this age.
46% - Percentage of people 21 to 64 having some type of disability who were employed in the past year. The rate ranged from 75 percent of those with a nonsevere disability to 31 percent with a severe disability. For those without a disability, the employment rate is 84 percent for the same period.
59% - Percent of people 21 to 64 with difficulty hearing that were employed. The corresponding percentage for those with difficulty seeing was 41 percent.
48% - Percentage of people 21 to 64 with a nonsevere disability who work full time. This compares with 63 percent without a disability and 16 percent with a severe disability.
$2,250 - Median monthly earnings for people 21 to 64 with a nonsevere disability. This compares with $2,539 for those with no disability and $1,458 for those with a severe disability.
$2,252 - Median monthly earnings for people 21 to 64 with difficulty hearing. The corresponding figure for those with difficulty seeing was $1,932.
12% - The poverty rate for people 25 to 64 with a nonsevere disability. This compares with 27 percent for those with a severe disability and 9 percent of those without a disability.
$28.2 billion - Amount of compensation veterans received for service-connected disabilities in fiscal year 2007.
98.5% - Percent of transit buses that were ADA lift- or ramp-equipped, as of 2006. This represents an increase from 61.7 percent in 1995.
******************************************************
Pineapple Angelfood Cake
1 package angel food cake mix
1 can crushed pineapple in water -- 20 Ounce Can
1. Combine both ingredients in large bowl.
2. Mix on medium speed with electric mixer.
3. Bake in accordance with cake mix box.
If you cut the cake in eighths the following nutritional information apply:
Calories: 204.7
Fat grams: 0.2
Fiber grams: 0.2
W/W Points: 4
YOU CAN ALSO MAKE IN CUPCAKES (MAKES 24 CUPCAKES) and THE FOLLOWING NUTRITIONAL INFORMATION APPLIES:
Calories: 68.2
Fat grams: 0.1
Fiber grams: 0.1
W/W Points: 1
Friday, March 27, 2009
The Gimp Project
The Gimp Project examines movement of dancers with disabilities.
Dancers with disabilities take the stage in a performance art piece entitled the Gimp Project at the Abrons Arts Center in New York. Staged by the Heidi Latsky Dance Company, the show offers a different look at disability, as the performers find beauty in imperfection and demonstrate inventive ways of working around mobility issues. (Video by Lisa Rose / The Star-Ledger)
Dancers with disabilities take the stage in a performance art piece entitled the Gimp Project at the Abrons Arts Center in New York. Staged by the Heidi Latsky Dance Company, the show offers a different look at disability, as the performers find beauty in imperfection and demonstrate inventive ways of working around mobility issues. (Video by Lisa Rose / The Star-Ledger)
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Thankful Thursday on Wednesday
Today I am thankful for the Virginia Board for People with Disabilities and their new campaign...
Today, in my state (Virginia), people are making a difference for Virginians with disabilities. Today, is the official launch of the ABLE TO CHOOSE public awareness campaign.
“The ABLE TO CHOOSE campaign invites Virginians to join in making all aspects of community life inclusive and welcoming to people with disabilities,” said Heidi Lawyer, Executive Director of the Virginia Board for People with Disabilities (VBPD).
“The Commonwealth has a promising opportunity to reform its historical focus on large state institutions and fully transition to a true community-based system of support for its citizens with disabilities, said 83% of Virginians in a recent poll funded in part by VBPD as part of the planning for ABLE TO CHOOSE.”
The campaign’s launch will take place at the Virginia General Assembly. Lawmakers, in town for 2 months, were offered coffee at 8am this morning, but they had only one choice – black coffee, no cream, no sugar, and no lattes. This lack of choice was intended as a friendly reminder that everyday options for person with disabilities in Virginia are still limited. The campaign asks legislators and the general public to imagine how they’s feel if they visited a coffee shop or restaurant and were offered few choices. This unimaginable situation, involving something as simple as coffee, represents the reality for many people with disabilities who have limited choiced in more important matters such as where they live and the services that they receive.
Lunch will also be offered to legislators, consisting of a menu with only one choice – item #46 – to represent Virginia’s standing as 46th among all states for community-based services for people with disabilities.
Over the next year, this outreach effort will continue, with Virginians taking part in community events, press coverage, public service announcements, online activity, educational material distribution, and other activities to motivate the community to become more involved in guaranteeing civil rights and equal opportunity.
I’m very excited about this campaign and will share more information about it as the year progresses. In the meantime, please take a moment to view this video:
Today, in my state (Virginia), people are making a difference for Virginians with disabilities. Today, is the official launch of the ABLE TO CHOOSE public awareness campaign.
“The ABLE TO CHOOSE campaign invites Virginians to join in making all aspects of community life inclusive and welcoming to people with disabilities,” said Heidi Lawyer, Executive Director of the Virginia Board for People with Disabilities (VBPD).
“The Commonwealth has a promising opportunity to reform its historical focus on large state institutions and fully transition to a true community-based system of support for its citizens with disabilities, said 83% of Virginians in a recent poll funded in part by VBPD as part of the planning for ABLE TO CHOOSE.”
The campaign’s launch will take place at the Virginia General Assembly. Lawmakers, in town for 2 months, were offered coffee at 8am this morning, but they had only one choice – black coffee, no cream, no sugar, and no lattes. This lack of choice was intended as a friendly reminder that everyday options for person with disabilities in Virginia are still limited. The campaign asks legislators and the general public to imagine how they’s feel if they visited a coffee shop or restaurant and were offered few choices. This unimaginable situation, involving something as simple as coffee, represents the reality for many people with disabilities who have limited choiced in more important matters such as where they live and the services that they receive.
Lunch will also be offered to legislators, consisting of a menu with only one choice – item #46 – to represent Virginia’s standing as 46th among all states for community-based services for people with disabilities.
Over the next year, this outreach effort will continue, with Virginians taking part in community events, press coverage, public service announcements, online activity, educational material distribution, and other activities to motivate the community to become more involved in guaranteeing civil rights and equal opportunity.
I’m very excited about this campaign and will share more information about it as the year progresses. In the meantime, please take a moment to view this video:
Labels:
accessiblity,
disability,
government,
inclusion
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)